HSDPA lär den inte ha, det är extremt strömkrävande, apple har ju kompletterat med wifi så det behövs egentligen inte.
tycker tjafset om 3g är så fånigt, om man bor i en stad så har man tillgång till wifi i princip jämt, jobbet affärer restauranger. därav har inte iphone 3g, eftersom wifi är så utbyggt i usa.
samma iphone kommer att släppas i europa, kan jag lova.
som steve säger:
Every AT&T Blackberry gets its mail over EDGE. EDGE is great for mail, and it works well for maps and a whole bunch of other stuff. Where you wish you had faster speed is…on a Web browser. It's good enough, but you wish it was a little faster. That's where sandwiching EDGE with Wi-Fi really makes sense because Wi-Fi is much faster than any 3G network.
When we looked at 3G, the chipsets were not low-enough power for what we were looking for. They were not integrated enough, so they took up too much physical space. We cared a lot about battery life and we cared a lot about physical size. Down the road, I'm sure some of those tradeoffs will become more favorable towards 3G but as of now we think we made a pretty good doggone decision.