Denna delen av 99 uppdateras inte längre utan har arkiverats inför framtiden som ett museum.
Här kan du läsa mer om varför.
Mac-nyheter hittar du på Macradion.com och forumet hittar du via Applebubblan.

Safari vs. KHTML, kulturkrockar hos de två utvecklingsteamen

Tråden skapades och har fått 3 svar. Det senaste inlägget skrevs .
1
  • Medlem
  • International user
  • 2005-05-13 13:07

Cnet News rapporterar om den konflikt som blossat upp mellan Safariutvecklarna och KHTML-utvecklarna. Det verkar vara både en teknisk och en kulturell konflikt.

http://news.com.com/Open-source+divorce+for+Apples+Safari/2100-1032_3-5703819.html?tag=st.num
http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/05/05/12/1555240.shtml?tid=95&tid=121&tid=3

Firefoxs huvudutvecklare Ben Goodger ställer sig på Apples/Safaris sida: Safari, KHTML, Perfection

Not everyone wants to change the world, but Apple does - and although they may have done the least required of them in accordance with the licenses of the original source code, it was within their rights to do what they did, and no one should begrudge them for it. Safari's renderer is vastly superior to the KHTML used by Konqueror. Should I have to wait months or years for every patch that makes Safari more compatible to be done perfectly? No. Well, maybe as a software engineer I should. But does anyone that isn't a software engineer care? Probably not. Case closed.

  • Medlem
  • International user
  • 2005-05-14 10:07

Här är vad som startade diskussionen:
http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1001

Citat:

Do you have any idea how hard it is to be merging between two totally different trees when one of them doesn’t have any history? That’s the situation KDE is in. We created the khtml-cvs list for Apple, they got CVS accounts for KDE CVS. What did we get? We get periodical code bombs in the form of them releasing WebCore. Many of us wanted to even sign NDA’s with Apple to at least get access to the history of their internal vcs and be able to be merging the changes incrementally, the way they can right now. Nothing came out of it. They do the very, very minimum required by LGPL.

And you know what? That’s their right. They made a conscious decision about not working with KDE developers. All I’m asking for is that all the clueless people stop talking about the cooperation between Safari/Konqueror developers and how great it is. There’s absolutely nothing great about it. In fact “it” doesn’t exist. Maybe for Apple - at the very least for their marketing people. Clear?

  • Medlem
  • International user
  • 2005-05-14 10:08
1
Bevaka tråden